05-29-2014, 10:26 AM
Mr Wells......I noticed that you have not response to either my or Mimosa's questions.
I completely agree with him. His questions are concerning and should be set straight .
My question is valid as well and we deserve a response. who would be better to do that than yourself.....being HACA treasure.
Answering these questions could be the beginning of mitigating any damages you may have done HARC's reputation in my mind.
Financial statements posted on an updated web site would go a long way to ease tension and insecuritys in this community as to HARC's trustworthiness.
You can not defend yourself or your boards position with excuses, diverting the topic, name calling or sheer nastiness. Speculating who is posting what under what name or how many times, is really child like.
As a HARC board member who professed that he had no problem spending every cent of road money on lawer fees, defended a request for tax dollars, and expects rd 1 residents to contribute more (after admitting they already pay the largest portion of funding), you owe this community an explination.
Refusing to address the issues is not acceptable.
It is time the tail stops wagging the dog Mr. Wells.
I completely agree with him. His questions are concerning and should be set straight .
My question is valid as well and we deserve a response. who would be better to do that than yourself.....being HACA treasure.
Answering these questions could be the beginning of mitigating any damages you may have done HARC's reputation in my mind.
Financial statements posted on an updated web site would go a long way to ease tension and insecuritys in this community as to HARC's trustworthiness.
You can not defend yourself or your boards position with excuses, diverting the topic, name calling or sheer nastiness. Speculating who is posting what under what name or how many times, is really child like.
As a HARC board member who professed that he had no problem spending every cent of road money on lawer fees, defended a request for tax dollars, and expects rd 1 residents to contribute more (after admitting they already pay the largest portion of funding), you owe this community an explination.
Refusing to address the issues is not acceptable.
It is time the tail stops wagging the dog Mr. Wells.