06-08-2014, 07:07 AM
to insinuate that new members of the board will somehow be liable for the wrongdoings of previous members is to make a mockery of the law. this is fear mongering. Further more there is a vast difference between the inference of inefficiency and self service and even cover-up, and the accusations of gross embezzlement and conspiracy. one is something we are all capable of. the other are criminal offenses that would require evidence of corruption that as far as i am aware simply does not exist. I am looking forward to the meeting and applaud all those with the courage to try to make positive change. i am hoping against hope that receivership is indeed the result of any court action that goes the course. the receivership of the people that brought the case!
just to be fair though - does it automatically mean in american law that if someone sues you, you HAVE to sue them back? can't you just defend a lawsuit without a countersuit?
#10048;
just to be fair though - does it automatically mean in american law that if someone sues you, you HAVE to sue them back? can't you just defend a lawsuit without a countersuit?
#10048;
#10048;