06-13-2014, 04:13 AM
No.
The proper place for cost/benefit analysis of mandatory dues is real estate disclosure.
Lots of people (myself included) like the rugged lifestyle afforded by a lack of road maintenance. Newcomers who think this will change are the ones in the wrong. People who want nicely maintained roads and other amenities should buy property in places that have those things. Simple as that.
Compare/contrast: buy a house near the airport, then complain that the airport is noisy and should be shut down -- it doesn't work that way, and there is plenty of legal precedent. This same principle should be applied to all existing circumstances.
The proper place for cost/benefit analysis of mandatory dues is real estate disclosure.
Lots of people (myself included) like the rugged lifestyle afforded by a lack of road maintenance. Newcomers who think this will change are the ones in the wrong. People who want nicely maintained roads and other amenities should buy property in places that have those things. Simple as that.
Compare/contrast: buy a house near the airport, then complain that the airport is noisy and should be shut down -- it doesn't work that way, and there is plenty of legal precedent. This same principle should be applied to all existing circumstances.