considering class action on HARC

[birchl]

I have decided not to post again, so I would like to leave you with a couple of thoughts. When I first started posting here I knew very little about what was happening here. I had simply wondered into a meeting to inquire about our 'rock'. Since then I have done a fair amount of research. I have come to the following conclusions. There is no evidence of gross misconduct within either board. Those allegations are being made by people that appear to have ulterior motives to muddying these waters. Those that bought into this subdivision did so knowing it was 'isolated', and knowing that is was classed as agricultural. Personally, I prefer that the roads be maintained as they are. The bumpy bits act as speed ramps and this is a dead end residential area with children and animals, not a thoroughfare. We do need to come together to maintain the worst bits and having a central fund has to be a good thing. This can all be arranged with just a little bit of aloha and common sense. The HACA and the HARC are not some nameless faceless corporations. These are your friends and neighbors. Your children will go to school with their children, your grandchildren will end up married to each other. Come the zombie apocalypse we are going to need each other
As far as the other law suits go, I started by saying that the macdonalds had a right to be heard and that it didn't matter how batty you were it didn't necessarily make you wrong. I stand by that, although I can now quite clearly see why the HACA site was closed to posters!! (Hopefully we can change that also). Cindy, your truth is getting lost in your lies. Take a few days out and try and work out which of your complaints lay in reality and which lay in retaliation and vindictiveness. I look forward to meeting some of you at the next meetings which I believe are on the 14 and 20 July. Lets move forward. My aloha to you all.

#10048;