07-17-2014, 06:53 AM
quote:
Originally posted by peteadams
Nothing has changed. The original study was discredited and the re-publishing did not alter the article except for some analysis at the end. The journal Nature looked at the re-publishing and wrote:
quote:http://www.nature.com/news/paper-claimin...ed-1.15463
ESEU [Environmental Sciences Europe, the re-publisher] conducted no scientific peer review, he adds, “because this had already been conducted by Food and Chemical Toxicology, and had concluded there had been no fraud nor misrepresentation.” The role of the three reviewers hired by ESEU was to check that there had been no change in the scientific content of the paper, Hollert adds.
The publication of the new version of the paper gives critics no reason to change their mind, says food-allergy researcher Richard Goodman of the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and biotechnology editor at FCT. "To my knowledge, no-one has demonstrated that a two-year feeding study of Sprague Dawley rats has uncovered any hazard that actually poses a risk to human or farm-animal health," he says, referring to the breed of rodents used in the study.
Yes much has changed , here is a link that explains in detail much about this study and how it was done by Monsanto as well , 8 years prior to this study - and just watch the video and see the way corparate fascism operates.
Just in case the link doesn't work
here is the name of the u tube:
Conclusive Link Between GMOs and Cancer | Brainwash Update
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cssKS-hzQ7U