Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . .
#48
quote:
Originally posted by Shonuff

Even Fern Acres, which has some of the best infrastructure of the private subdivisions of district 5, has a checkered history which leads to much confusion. My understanding is that they will get a second access road, which is good, but these so-called private developments that were allowed without proper planning and infrastructure are a nightmare. Instead of squabbling about something 30 years ago let's face our reality of today head on, which Frannie will do. At least she doesn't bring up Railroad Ave., which someone at the CDP access roads meeting said will unlikely ever happen and is also district 4. There are answers out there, but they won't be found if you keep barking up the same tree.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . . - by missydog1 - 07-16-2014, 02:39 PM
RE: Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . . - by missydog1 - 07-22-2014, 04:53 PM
RE: Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . . - by missydog1 - 07-24-2014, 07:06 AM
RE: Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . . - by missydog1 - 07-28-2014, 04:56 PM
RE: Questionable Campaign Ethics Afoot. . . - by Shonuff - 08-06-2014, 07:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 15 Guest(s)