12-26-2014, 06:35 PM
I think there may be deep differences in communication styles that makes any discourse challenging. On one side is an expectation for silence and a receiving of wisdom without question or comment. On the other is a tradition of analytical inquiry where understanding is achieved through questioning and debate. Bring them together and misunderstandings seem almost inevitable.
FWIW, there were no debates over Pele, origin stories, or an attempt to change anyone's mind. Rather there was a backlash against any counter views on diversion, even those that were based in fact and stated politely. The intimidation tactics involved were questionable if an open dialogue is desired. Given the possible cultural differences above that may not be the goal at all.
Online forums cut both ways; they provide anonymity for bad intent and safe speech depending on the community at hand. Given some of what I've seen recently we should recognize the unique and valuable resource Punaweb is especially during these times of change.
FWIW, there were no debates over Pele, origin stories, or an attempt to change anyone's mind. Rather there was a backlash against any counter views on diversion, even those that were based in fact and stated politely. The intimidation tactics involved were questionable if an open dialogue is desired. Given the possible cultural differences above that may not be the goal at all.
Online forums cut both ways; they provide anonymity for bad intent and safe speech depending on the community at hand. Given some of what I've seen recently we should recognize the unique and valuable resource Punaweb is especially during these times of change.