HPP Board 2014

[hppwatchdog]

quote:

---

Originally posted by caveat emptor

I see that the good folks at ponohpp.com have posted the responses to the lawsuit against us from the attorney for the BOD. I also noticed that on page 4 of the Amended Answers and #25 something very interesting.
It looks like the BOD had to try to remedy their illegal firing... "Defendants assert board of director ratification as affirmative defense.".
I wonder if that will reduce the Associations liability for the 5 BOD members illegal revenge against the employees? Because it won't on all the other counts against the named defendants.

CE, I spoke with two of the terminated employees yesterday after meeting with their lawyer. Wait until you see the next move they are preparing against the Association and each director named in the complaint. Remember as long as the insurance company doesn't take the case the Association and each defendant are not indemnified and the Association and each director will be responsible for damages and legal fees.
Moreover, the terminated employees are suing the Association and EACH director for damages.

As a responsible owner, the question that needs to be asked at the January BOD meeting is,

Is the insurance company defending the Association and directors or are we going it alone, at our cost from road fees? This is not confidential information regarding the case either, we are due an answer to this questions without delay!


Maybe you FOBS (Friends of the BOD) can explain to us what that means? Maybe you can find the answer on the HPP web site posted under "BOD Secret Meeting Minutes"? Maybe the BOD will discuss it at the next BOD meeting the way they have kept us informed all along?

---