01-28-2015, 03:14 PM
Originally posted by hppwatchdog:
In my opinion, the law suit against the Association is a slam dunk.
Originally posted by mermaid and reiterating the msg:
The former GM keeps stirring the pot. He is invested in this lawsuit..why wouldn't winning mean everything? That's all he keeps telling us...that he's winning. Why would anyone think that he cares about the association? He's suing the association, he's suing US. Take what he and his supporters say w/a grain of salt.
Originally posted by hppwatchdog:
Don't you understand that she should have said NOTHING! Her actions are what supports the defamation charges. The rest of the board did the right thing and kept their gums shut. Even you say that the board can't talk about the lawsuit.
BTW, all 6 are being sued independent from the Association. Once they are found guilty of violating the law there is no indemnification.
I do care about the Association, but I care more about the truth. If these directors harmed the TE's then they have to pay for it. To bad it's our money supporting their illegal activities.
____________________________________________________________________
hppwatchdog, you can't be both the former GM, and a HPPOA member when you don't own property in HPP. You're forgetting which hats you're wearing when you're posting here. As I said earlier, only the former GM would say the things you've said.. we've known each other for over 4 yrs through my committee work. You've been discussing work that ties in w/the last paving project, RPM's and road striping in your recent posts. That's GM stuff.
Which brings us to your saying "our" money. It's members' money and you're suing us. Some of you want to distract what led to the terminations. Where were some of these members who are defending the TE's so vigorously when we were having big issues w/the previous mgmt???? Not at any board meetings I can remember. Came to the party a bit late, got maybe half the picture, half the truth, piggy backing on what others have told them bc they weren't in the trenches themselves=misinformed.
NO ONE gets terminated for nothing. This issue is more complicated than most understand and some are terribly misinformed. If anyone wants the truth, find out what happened during the previous mgmt's tenure. Go digging, get the whole picture, get your own truth. Read previous minutes. One person doesn't want anyone to talk about the past, but you're not informed otherwise.
I don't support the method of the terminations and I'm furious about our state of affairs after 6+ months w/no GM. I can only surmise why someone dragged their feet this long and it's very disturbing. The HRC started their work in August and I believe a GM ad could've been in the paper by Sep. That should've been the first order of business, hire a GM ASAP. It's so disturbing that they've been wearing two hats this long.
Our bylaw needs to be changed regarding the "6 mo interim" and perhaps no board member s/b allowed to be an interim employee at all. The line btw employee and board duties have been severely blurred.
In my opinion, the law suit against the Association is a slam dunk.
Originally posted by mermaid and reiterating the msg:
The former GM keeps stirring the pot. He is invested in this lawsuit..why wouldn't winning mean everything? That's all he keeps telling us...that he's winning. Why would anyone think that he cares about the association? He's suing the association, he's suing US. Take what he and his supporters say w/a grain of salt.
Originally posted by hppwatchdog:
Don't you understand that she should have said NOTHING! Her actions are what supports the defamation charges. The rest of the board did the right thing and kept their gums shut. Even you say that the board can't talk about the lawsuit.
BTW, all 6 are being sued independent from the Association. Once they are found guilty of violating the law there is no indemnification.
I do care about the Association, but I care more about the truth. If these directors harmed the TE's then they have to pay for it. To bad it's our money supporting their illegal activities.
____________________________________________________________________
hppwatchdog, you can't be both the former GM, and a HPPOA member when you don't own property in HPP. You're forgetting which hats you're wearing when you're posting here. As I said earlier, only the former GM would say the things you've said.. we've known each other for over 4 yrs through my committee work. You've been discussing work that ties in w/the last paving project, RPM's and road striping in your recent posts. That's GM stuff.
Which brings us to your saying "our" money. It's members' money and you're suing us. Some of you want to distract what led to the terminations. Where were some of these members who are defending the TE's so vigorously when we were having big issues w/the previous mgmt???? Not at any board meetings I can remember. Came to the party a bit late, got maybe half the picture, half the truth, piggy backing on what others have told them bc they weren't in the trenches themselves=misinformed.
NO ONE gets terminated for nothing. This issue is more complicated than most understand and some are terribly misinformed. If anyone wants the truth, find out what happened during the previous mgmt's tenure. Go digging, get the whole picture, get your own truth. Read previous minutes. One person doesn't want anyone to talk about the past, but you're not informed otherwise.
I don't support the method of the terminations and I'm furious about our state of affairs after 6+ months w/no GM. I can only surmise why someone dragged their feet this long and it's very disturbing. The HRC started their work in August and I believe a GM ad could've been in the paper by Sep. That should've been the first order of business, hire a GM ASAP. It's so disturbing that they've been wearing two hats this long.
Our bylaw needs to be changed regarding the "6 mo interim" and perhaps no board member s/b allowed to be an interim employee at all. The line btw employee and board duties have been severely blurred.