04-08-2015, 12:38 PM
Originally posted by Punatic007
Who with any honorable and respected credentials finds this a worthy cause? Please enlighten me and tell us their rationale.
I thought snorkle did a good job out outlining some of the rationale in his Protector Talking Points earlier (not sure of his honorable or respected credentials though - it might all just be a setup for a punchline
snorkle - you used "we" so you appear to be directly involved, yet your points are centered around the idea that state and federal law applies and you did not mention the illegal occupation issue. As such, do you believe that there is a process to address these concerns that still allows for the TMT to be constructed on Mauna Kea?
Who with any honorable and respected credentials finds this a worthy cause? Please enlighten me and tell us their rationale.
I thought snorkle did a good job out outlining some of the rationale in his Protector Talking Points earlier (not sure of his honorable or respected credentials though - it might all just be a setup for a punchline
snorkle - you used "we" so you appear to be directly involved, yet your points are centered around the idea that state and federal law applies and you did not mention the illegal occupation issue. As such, do you believe that there is a process to address these concerns that still allows for the TMT to be constructed on Mauna Kea?