04-18-2015, 09:13 AM
quote:
Originally posted by lavalava
quote:
Originally posted by Kukailimoku
Question for the wise. Since Mr. Kenoi reimbursed the county for his personal purchases, did the county suffer any loss of something of value. Theft requires the specific intent to deprive the county of something of value. What was that something and how much was the value. I am having trouble finding any crime he may have committed? Also, is keeping the per diem while using the p-card that he reimbursed a criminal act? How late did he reimburse the county for the p-card double dips?
Wow - another Kenoi apologist. What makes these people tick? Is it that they have no ethical standards in their own lives? Are they really enamored with Billys smile? I just dont get how this is not a big deal to people.
You missed the point. There is a vast difference between what is immoral and bizzre behavior demonstrated by Mr. Kenoi and criminal behavior which must fit into the cubbyhole that defines the crime. But I see him getting away with it because the government will not be able to prove that he intended to steal the money. Look up the definition of "theft" in the Hawaii Penal Code, and you may understand. Civil consequences are also out there.