04-30-2015, 04:10 PM
Removal of an officer of the board has been done in the past during board mtgs. This isn't an executive session agenda item. But this can be an embarrassing process for the board member if board members are discussing the reasons for the removal, or not.
HPPOA Bylaws Article VIII-Board of Directors, Sec 7 Removal: "Any officer, director, or agent elected or appointed may be removed by the persons authorized to elect or appoint the officer, director, or agent with or without cause." (By majority vote of the board)
This information isn't "gossip". Its a fact, and should be released to us in a timely manner given the subject. Some board members may not want us to know about this and pretend like it didn't happen, and therefore never release it. We have lost 2 valuable board members which can now take us back to that place of non transparency and decisions made by a few, and the rest kept out of the loop.
Up til very recently, BJ and other board members have asked for financial information and never received it. The HRC asked again at the last board mtg stating they needed it for their work. The secretary who resigned recently hadn't been included as a signatory per our bylaws. She was in ofc for approx 5 mos.
BJ openly stated at 2 different board mtgs that she hasn't signed a check in a couple of months, and that was two months ago. So who's signing the checks? Who's really in the driver's seat? This is why the membership needs to have this information. The Pres may be loud, but that doesn't mean she had or has any control of what's going on or is in the loop.
The board member who no longer is VP shouldn't be signing checks or doing any VP duties until they reinstate her at the next mtg. She's breaking the bylaws if she does. I'm sure she'll be reinstated soon enough now that they are a majority again.
Regarding the "deposition". This is the word the friends of HPP facebook lady used in her report.
HPPOA Bylaws Article VIII-Board of Directors, Sec 7 Removal: "Any officer, director, or agent elected or appointed may be removed by the persons authorized to elect or appoint the officer, director, or agent with or without cause." (By majority vote of the board)
This information isn't "gossip". Its a fact, and should be released to us in a timely manner given the subject. Some board members may not want us to know about this and pretend like it didn't happen, and therefore never release it. We have lost 2 valuable board members which can now take us back to that place of non transparency and decisions made by a few, and the rest kept out of the loop.
Up til very recently, BJ and other board members have asked for financial information and never received it. The HRC asked again at the last board mtg stating they needed it for their work. The secretary who resigned recently hadn't been included as a signatory per our bylaws. She was in ofc for approx 5 mos.
BJ openly stated at 2 different board mtgs that she hasn't signed a check in a couple of months, and that was two months ago. So who's signing the checks? Who's really in the driver's seat? This is why the membership needs to have this information. The Pres may be loud, but that doesn't mean she had or has any control of what's going on or is in the loop.
The board member who no longer is VP shouldn't be signing checks or doing any VP duties until they reinstate her at the next mtg. She's breaking the bylaws if she does. I'm sure she'll be reinstated soon enough now that they are a majority again.
Regarding the "deposition". This is the word the friends of HPP facebook lady used in her report.