05-26-2015, 07:29 AM
quote:I'll reiterate, no board vote to change our website, no other bids sought, no board vote in a meeting to hire anyone=no disclosure=dismissal. Reni, good work, you hit the nail on the head. Only the board can do the dismissal.
Originally posted by Orchidlandguy
From the evidence packets provided by the VP at the last Board meeting:
Emails indicate that the website was contracted and negotiated by BJ Mulinex alone. The VP was not involved. BJ did the hiring without board approval.
None of you will be able to find anything in the minutes except a rep's response when an association member asked about our website during a morning October board mtg. No specifics were given except that they did hire someone and it was someone they liked who lived in Calif. VP sat quiet at other mtgs when the question came up again and again. Not behavior of someone who's supposed to be transparent.
It's a conflict of interest for the VP period bc it was her niece who was hired. Pointing the finger at the Pres doesn't change that. The VP recommended her niece to certain reps on the board to do the job. How else would they know about her and then hire her? Hello?
You're right Orchidlandguy..there's a $1500 limit on the GM's expenditures w/out board vote. So $3000 expenditure w/out board vote violated our bylaws.