08-24-2015, 10:48 PM
quote:Just exactly what is your problem with both exercises of First Amendment Rights - his to deliver his message via placards etc., or the paper's to publish such info. Both are fully protected and, further, healthy examples of a rights-respecting society. Obviously, you are not so keen on respecting those rights. The "message" of the speech is immaterial, it is the right of expression of said message that is crucially-important.
Originally posted by ericlp
http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/news...-spiritual
I guess it sells the paper. If I were a subscriber I would seriously consider not re upping my subscription.
Some things fully-deserve to be hated - like your seeming intolerance to Free Expression!!