Does this really belong on the front page?

[Sugarloaf]

quote:

---

Originally posted by kalakoa

Also, nobody has total control over their body. For example,suicide is illegal. The argument that she is d9infg5 what she wants with her body is specious

How about "involuntary pregnancy due to rape/incest", same answer?

---

I will give you the long answer, so you can see how simple the issue is.

In any society, people have rights, but they often come in conflict with other people and their rights. Also, some rights, like the right to life, are more important than other rights, such as speech or to vote. You can't kill somebody in order to exercise you right to speech. The higher order right must always prevail when two rights conflict.

In this case, you have the right of the woman to have a degree of control over her body, vs the right of the pre-born child to live. In such a conflict, the right of the pre-born child to live, trumps the right of the woman to control her body. After all, the baby is NOT part of her, it is it's own self merely living INSIDE her. For example, a person inside your house, isn't part of your house - he or she is merely INSIDE (but not part of, your house). Unless their is a definite near certainty that carrying and giving birth to the human being insider the mother will kill the mother, the right of the pre-born child to life, trumps.

It is the right of life, on one hand, to the right of convenience on the other. The pre-born child's rights are not diminished to any degree by the circumstances which brought about its exists. Infanticide is infanticide - period.

Now if you can abort, and preserve the right of the child, well go ahead, but remember, if you kill the child, it is murder.