03-13-2016, 03:05 AM
Not too sure about this as, it appears that Tru-tag is simply using quantum dots. Accordingly, non cadmium or metal quantum dots, may be safe for consumption. If you consider a 3 point crystal 100th the thickness of a human hair safe enough to run through you system and not cut open a cell or somtin. . Get clogged up somewhere and become effectively similar to what asbestos does. Asbestos is a problem because once inside of your system, there' no biologic ability to break the crystals down so, your body encapsulates it and that biologic material can invite cancerous disease. Or something to this effect, it's been way to many years since I learned what's going on, so, too paraphrase, in essence, that's what's happening. Accordingly, 25 years ago whenever I spoke to a head in wash DC, he said; the only reason fiber glass is not the exact same asbestos problem is because, its use is not as old and proven as asbestos is, yet basically, ya can't break down glass in your body and or lungs exactly the same as asbestos.. ;(
But why Hawaii or any state should, would or could hand out cash to any company anywhere seems a waste of funds because, there's plenty who are attempting to apply quantum dots for this application all across the globe.
Is a nano dot, small enough? Who knows but, for sure it's a crystal, and it ain't gonna break down too, which is subject to the same biological encapsulation. ;0 Moreover state substituting this, may turn into a liability.
"TruTag microtags are secure, optically-encoded" Currently the top use for quantum dots are TV screens. Tru-tags's description hints, it's what they're using. Quantum dot tech current possibilities also includes unique micro, quantum identification and solar cell substitutes. The industry hopes for many openings for the uses too.
I've been following this company (linked below) for a while. perhaps you can get an idea of why, personally, I do not think state funds are appropriate : http://www.qmcdots.com/ Moreover, sounds like there's some pay-o-la involved inside of Hawaiian state Legislature.
Quantum manufacturing corp has ,in recent times, indicated, after expecting Q-dot tags to be a big money maker, all but abandoned their R and R for this. They would not do this unless they're expecting failure of some uncertain, undisclosed type.(public companies never kiss and tell negatives) Legislative pay-o-la? perhaps. I.E. if you're not watching where they'll pump you money, who will.
But why Hawaii or any state should, would or could hand out cash to any company anywhere seems a waste of funds because, there's plenty who are attempting to apply quantum dots for this application all across the globe.
Is a nano dot, small enough? Who knows but, for sure it's a crystal, and it ain't gonna break down too, which is subject to the same biological encapsulation. ;0 Moreover state substituting this, may turn into a liability.
"TruTag microtags are secure, optically-encoded" Currently the top use for quantum dots are TV screens. Tru-tags's description hints, it's what they're using. Quantum dot tech current possibilities also includes unique micro, quantum identification and solar cell substitutes. The industry hopes for many openings for the uses too.
I've been following this company (linked below) for a while. perhaps you can get an idea of why, personally, I do not think state funds are appropriate : http://www.qmcdots.com/ Moreover, sounds like there's some pay-o-la involved inside of Hawaiian state Legislature.
Quantum manufacturing corp has ,in recent times, indicated, after expecting Q-dot tags to be a big money maker, all but abandoned their R and R for this. They would not do this unless they're expecting failure of some uncertain, undisclosed type.(public companies never kiss and tell negatives) Legislative pay-o-la? perhaps. I.E. if you're not watching where they'll pump you money, who will.