VLBA facility and vehicles damaged on Mauna Kea

[oink]

OK, went back and read #7. It's as M.R. and I said, except it's written in lawyerese. The (run on) sentence establishes #1) That the time and place are within the jurisdiction of the court and charging office and the identity of the defendant. After establishing jurisdiction it continues with: #2) It establishes that he intentionally (not accidentally) engaged in an action to commit the act. #3) That he believed he could carry out the act. #4) That he had the intent to commit the act which is criminal. All of that after establishing jurisdiction and the identity of the defendant was pretty much just quoting the elements of "Criminal Attempt" or whatever HI calls it.

It then lays out the elements for the criminal act he intended to commit, by pretty much just quoting the statute.

None of it is informative as to what he actually did. The original arresting officer's P.C. may have been more informative unless it was just direct filed by the prosecutor. In that case you will have to go to the police Incident Report and probable supplements to learn anything meaningful.

I'm not sure that that was at all helpful.

Pua`a
S. FL
Big Islander to be.