04-04-2016, 03:26 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Chunkster
Well, this morning's HNL daily says that the charges for the bike, the surfboard, the bar association dues, and the hostess bar(s) are not covered in the indictment. The prosecutors refused to say exactly what was covered, but based on some dates given, the paper said some were likely in Washington, D.C. and several were Big Island food outlets.
There is no pCard law. It is an agreement between the State and the employee. The only time the law comes in is if some felony was committed with the pCard, like buying drugs or paying a hit man with a pCard (Punatic fools will believe this). Food establishment charges aren't going to be theft. The AG has put together a very weak case and his approach, first with TMT, and now with the pCard, is showing his wobbling knees. The only thing left in the charge is deliberate theft, and theft has to be reported to become a charge. Which one of the patrons that Uncle Billy 'stole' from is filing charges? None, they got paid. So, is the county claiming they were the victims of theft? Haven't seen that anywhere, it is the state filing the charges. The judges are opting out because they know there is no law specifically regarding the pCard and they would face having to construct one, which would be a real can of worms.
But this is Puna and PW, where public lynching is a past time, just like it was in the South during the 60's. We all know only righteous and pure white people are exalted enough to deliver God's justice upon the wicked, the colored and the deserving.
"Aloha also means goodbye. Aloha!"
*Japanese tourist on bus through Pahoa, "Is this still America?*