|
the NIMBY tax
|
06-10-2016, 10:10 AM
Does anyone know if the county would be required to remedy the arsenic problem if they purchase the land? I suppose it would depend on what use, if any, the contaminated part was put to, but it has the potential to dwarf that maintenance expense KeaauRich quite sensibly mentions.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
the NIMBY tax - by kalakoa - 06-10-2016, 04:03 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by HiloPuna - 06-10-2016, 06:01 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by dakine - 06-10-2016, 06:14 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by kalakoa - 06-10-2016, 07:00 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by KeaauRich - 06-10-2016, 09:15 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by Chunkster - 06-10-2016, 10:10 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by HereOnThePrimalEdge - 06-11-2016, 05:32 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by dakine - 06-11-2016, 06:11 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by kalakoa - 06-11-2016, 07:21 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by HiloPuna - 06-11-2016, 09:20 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by pahoated - 06-11-2016, 10:20 AM
RE: the NIMBY tax - by HiloPuna - 06-12-2016, 08:46 AM
|
