06-28-2016, 07:40 PM
quote:(*Snipped for brevity) Aloha ahiahi, Mr. Tom. Completely understand, given the statement made. (Gypsy, please understand this kind of unfounded position reaps this response from Mr. Tom. No pearls here, Gypsy. Sorry.)
Originally posted by TomK
quote:
Originally posted by gypsy69
Speaking about projects wanting to collect Data or INFO? ...
Saving this nonsense for the future. Gypsy isn't trolling, these are the ravings of a lunatic.
Frankly, I don't care what information is shared with what country, what is utilized for "security", what is deciphered, gleaned, edited for media (propaganda), nor if "Hangar 18" is down the damn street!
The biggest concern I have is when digging two (2) stories down into Mauna Kea, that the law states, the land must be returned to "the original state when leased (not prior to)" (not verbatim, but damn close; we use it in all of our AG leases) at the end of the lease. Now, under US law, and the master lease (and the sub-lease), how is TMT or any other observatory in the future going to adhere to that condition?
Going to rest now, tomorrow is another day to "collect feedback about Mauna Kea". SMH. (Again)
JMO.
ETA; clarity/re: Lease language