08-28-2016, 03:45 PM
Leilanidude
On 8/25 I responded:
Posted - 08/25/2016 : 07:17:25 Show Profile Edit Reply Reply with Quote Delete Reply
".... So do you think he was exempted from keeping receipts and the reporting requirements as well..."
No, I don't. And it seems that is the basis for the indictment. It wasn't that he made any allowed purchase, personal or otherwise. We now know* that was legal and within the rules. Instead it's the reporting , or misreporting, that is the issue.
* with the exception of some on this forum
i believe he was (properly) exempted from rules that otherwise applied to PCard users. However I don't believe he was exempted from the mechanical/technical issues, e.g reporting.
That does bother me. But I don't believe those issues warrant impeachment or indictment.
On 8/25 I responded:
Posted - 08/25/2016 : 07:17:25 Show Profile Edit Reply Reply with Quote Delete Reply
".... So do you think he was exempted from keeping receipts and the reporting requirements as well..."
No, I don't. And it seems that is the basis for the indictment. It wasn't that he made any allowed purchase, personal or otherwise. We now know* that was legal and within the rules. Instead it's the reporting , or misreporting, that is the issue.
* with the exception of some on this forum
i believe he was (properly) exempted from rules that otherwise applied to PCard users. However I don't believe he was exempted from the mechanical/technical issues, e.g reporting.
That does bother me. But I don't believe those issues warrant impeachment or indictment.