09-04-2016, 12:08 PM
RJ
Relax, this is not getting any deeper, if anything it's getting clearer. As the facts are brought out we'll get out from under the cloud of confusion that Cook Lauer (CL) created with her obfuscations and hyperbole. As an example, contrast this article that John Burnett (JB) wrote with any of CL's. JB's is quite extensive, as were many of CL's , but the information is presented in a systematic, concise form with out the cant and innuendo that CL constantly interwove.
JB's questioning of the attorney Lawson provides good context for understanding what's underlying the release of email issues, and what the implications and consequences are likely to be. I would surmise with CL on the courts list she will no longer be opining on this subject so hopefully JB will continue as the reporter on the case. In my opinion Tom Callis was no improvement over CL on this subject.
gypsy
I wonder that with all of your conjecture, that is the use of "may" in all your various scenarios, how do you ever arrive at an opinion or conclusion that is fact based ? Is that why you "jmo" so frequently, so as to minimize or diminish your position because there is so much supposition ?
Relax, this is not getting any deeper, if anything it's getting clearer. As the facts are brought out we'll get out from under the cloud of confusion that Cook Lauer (CL) created with her obfuscations and hyperbole. As an example, contrast this article that John Burnett (JB) wrote with any of CL's. JB's is quite extensive, as were many of CL's , but the information is presented in a systematic, concise form with out the cant and innuendo that CL constantly interwove.
JB's questioning of the attorney Lawson provides good context for understanding what's underlying the release of email issues, and what the implications and consequences are likely to be. I would surmise with CL on the courts list she will no longer be opining on this subject so hopefully JB will continue as the reporter on the case. In my opinion Tom Callis was no improvement over CL on this subject.
gypsy
I wonder that with all of your conjecture, that is the use of "may" in all your various scenarios, how do you ever arrive at an opinion or conclusion that is fact based ? Is that why you "jmo" so frequently, so as to minimize or diminish your position because there is so much supposition ?