10-18-2016, 07:32 PM
"TomK wrote: As you brought up ethics, I'd like to know how this "committee" obtained the mailing addresses of people."
"This alludes to the recall committee, who are doing a legit and honest recall petition process, as being unethical in how they obtained the addresses. That's throwing shade and there was no reason for it. There's nothing wrong in how we obtained the addresses and this seems to be the main object of discussion for a couple of you. We did a good job as a matter of fact and I'm proud of how we are handling the petition process."
I mentioned ethics not because I'm accusing anyone of being unethical, but because it's relevant. Who is this so-called "recall committee" and what process was used to obtain people's mailing addresses?
You can answer that nothing was wrong in how you obtained addresses or whether it was a good job, but that says nothing at all. I'm asking how it was done. It's not a hard question.
"This alludes to the recall committee, who are doing a legit and honest recall petition process, as being unethical in how they obtained the addresses. That's throwing shade and there was no reason for it. There's nothing wrong in how we obtained the addresses and this seems to be the main object of discussion for a couple of you. We did a good job as a matter of fact and I'm proud of how we are handling the petition process."
I mentioned ethics not because I'm accusing anyone of being unethical, but because it's relevant. Who is this so-called "recall committee" and what process was used to obtain people's mailing addresses?
You can answer that nothing was wrong in how you obtained addresses or whether it was a good job, but that says nothing at all. I'm asking how it was done. It's not a hard question.