12-27-2016, 05:13 AM
'dude
Cut'n paste any portion of a post where I praise "hawaii democrats" or argue for that group of politicians. I'll wait.
As far as "deflection" of criticism of Billy you seem to misunderstand argumentitve process and style. I believe I have made more substantive arguments supported by facts much more often than the generalized, solely opinion based criticism Kenoi as received on this forum.
As an example of my willingness to engage look at this recent set of posts twixt you and I. I first compared two individuals that share certain tendencies of personality. One I then deemed potentially more dangerous than the other due to the scale of his future office, the most powerful office on the planet (think about that for a while. A feckless reality TV buffoon who has never served the public in any capacity)
You then make a paraphrased response further likening the local situation with the national one but then decide to categorize my criticism of Trump as a "dissing" of Conservatives.
I then specifically respond to your assertion regarding their political philosophy and state that neither one of these gents has shown themselves to be a Conservative*.
You then state I've engaged in "deflection" rather than provide any basis for your position that I "diss" Conservatives. You could have done that by making some kind of fact based argument that (either) one of the two is a "Conservative". Instead you deflected away from this be accusing me of "deflection"
Too clever by half....
*dont confuse (or conflate) running as a Republican with being a Conservative. Taking a conservative position from time to time is not the same thing at all.
Cut'n paste any portion of a post where I praise "hawaii democrats" or argue for that group of politicians. I'll wait.
As far as "deflection" of criticism of Billy you seem to misunderstand argumentitve process and style. I believe I have made more substantive arguments supported by facts much more often than the generalized, solely opinion based criticism Kenoi as received on this forum.
As an example of my willingness to engage look at this recent set of posts twixt you and I. I first compared two individuals that share certain tendencies of personality. One I then deemed potentially more dangerous than the other due to the scale of his future office, the most powerful office on the planet (think about that for a while. A feckless reality TV buffoon who has never served the public in any capacity)
You then make a paraphrased response further likening the local situation with the national one but then decide to categorize my criticism of Trump as a "dissing" of Conservatives.
I then specifically respond to your assertion regarding their political philosophy and state that neither one of these gents has shown themselves to be a Conservative*.
You then state I've engaged in "deflection" rather than provide any basis for your position that I "diss" Conservatives. You could have done that by making some kind of fact based argument that (either) one of the two is a "Conservative". Instead you deflected away from this be accusing me of "deflection"
Too clever by half....
*dont confuse (or conflate) running as a Republican with being a Conservative. Taking a conservative position from time to time is not the same thing at all.