02-02-2017, 08:42 AM
What's not to like?
There's nothing wrong with strictly enforced "R-normal" CC&Rs if they're compatible with your lifestyle choices. I think of Nanavale as a "family-oriented" subdivision with "good resale value".
Similarly, there's nothing wrong with "no code" subdivisions.
The only "problem" seems to be signing up for the wrong deal. This is where I think better real estate disclosures would be appropriate, because "paper due diligence" won't illustrate actual real-world conditions, and people don't usually bother with "real due diligence" (renting a house in the area, camping out on a vacant lot, etc).
There's nothing wrong with strictly enforced "R-normal" CC&Rs if they're compatible with your lifestyle choices. I think of Nanavale as a "family-oriented" subdivision with "good resale value".
Similarly, there's nothing wrong with "no code" subdivisions.
The only "problem" seems to be signing up for the wrong deal. This is where I think better real estate disclosures would be appropriate, because "paper due diligence" won't illustrate actual real-world conditions, and people don't usually bother with "real due diligence" (renting a house in the area, camping out on a vacant lot, etc).