02-17-2017, 01:49 PM
Good question reni. I have just heard that it looks like the board at the Wed. meeting has finally discovered that maybe they didn't know what they were doing when they sent out that "misguided" mailbox letter in the road maintenance billing and have decided to contact an attorney (using our money of course) to ask his opinion on whether they have the authority or if the association has the authority to pass an assessment on their neighbors for something some members want but others don't. More wasted money, why don't they try reading the bylaw they tried to scam the association with, you know the one that says special assessments are only for for road maintenance or maybe (I'm being facetious) ask one of the "poison ten" Jerry Sodan, Jr. keeps ranting about on Facebook. I bet they could enlighten his understanding without the use of pejoratives.
One possible problem with the board wasting money on another attorney is what happened last year when they asked the very same attorney questions that had nothing to do with the arbitration issues and BEHOLD! they got the answer back that they wanted.
The board also, I have heard, has decided to send back the $150 to each of the poor souls who were so sadly deceived because of the scam letter in the road maintenance billing. Let's see what happens with that...
One possible problem with the board wasting money on another attorney is what happened last year when they asked the very same attorney questions that had nothing to do with the arbitration issues and BEHOLD! they got the answer back that they wanted.
The board also, I have heard, has decided to send back the $150 to each of the poor souls who were so sadly deceived because of the scam letter in the road maintenance billing. Let's see what happens with that...