03-02-2017, 06:51 AM
" . . . it would still require cooperation between the board and the membership."
Not necessarily. In 1996, Judge Nakamura decided that things had gone too far and put HPP into receivership for almost four years. That reset obviously didn't work, mainly because the hui was reconstituted along the same general lines as before, only with a purpose restricted to road maintenance and some slightly improved bylaws. Another trip through receivership ending with a totally different system as outlined in my last post would be a radical departure from the failed volunteer board model. Of course, some people would have to find a new hobby, but we would all be better off in the long run.
Not necessarily. In 1996, Judge Nakamura decided that things had gone too far and put HPP into receivership for almost four years. That reset obviously didn't work, mainly because the hui was reconstituted along the same general lines as before, only with a purpose restricted to road maintenance and some slightly improved bylaws. Another trip through receivership ending with a totally different system as outlined in my last post would be a radical departure from the failed volunteer board model. Of course, some people would have to find a new hobby, but we would all be better off in the long run.