03-04-2017, 06:08 AM
Obie provided this info on the HPP Road Maint thread regarding the receivership. In reading the case, you'll find current Dist 2 rep was mentioned w/in the court files. Heard she was on the Road Maint Committee back then when the roads were managed by that committee.
http://hoohiki.courts.hawaii.gov/#/case?...C960000038
BOB LERRO VS PARADISE HUI HANALIKE ET AL
case id 3CC960000038
Obie posted:
From reading the court record and meeting minutes from then it looks like it cost HPP thousands in court fees and fees to the temporary master.This thing drug on for 4 1/2 years and the end result was a re-write of the bylaws to require all money collected to be used for roads.
So if the board provides this info to the atty (as they should) to get an accurate atty decision, I don't understand how the atty will say the board can use Special Assessments to fund the mailbox project...assessing 8,800 members $150.00 ea = $1,320,000?
Keep in mind that when we were in receivership many years ago, we didn't have a bond. This brings a different aspect into the picture of receivership today.
http://hoohiki.courts.hawaii.gov/#/case?...C960000038
BOB LERRO VS PARADISE HUI HANALIKE ET AL
case id 3CC960000038
Obie posted:
From reading the court record and meeting minutes from then it looks like it cost HPP thousands in court fees and fees to the temporary master.This thing drug on for 4 1/2 years and the end result was a re-write of the bylaws to require all money collected to be used for roads.
So if the board provides this info to the atty (as they should) to get an accurate atty decision, I don't understand how the atty will say the board can use Special Assessments to fund the mailbox project...assessing 8,800 members $150.00 ea = $1,320,000?
Keep in mind that when we were in receivership many years ago, we didn't have a bond. This brings a different aspect into the picture of receivership today.