County resolution 205-17

[Seeb]

quote:

---

Originally posted by geochem

I'm afraid that I don't understand the logic here - the infrastructure in Puna and Ka'u isn't being subsidized by the other districts and, therefore, those districts are being discriminated against?

Of course, this seems to be the prevailing logic: "the gummint has to meet all my needs, right now and with only the best that's available.... oh, and I shouldn't have to pay for it..."

---

The 2000 case proved that Puna is subsidizing Hilo.