10-09-2017, 05:19 PM
Randomg - H.A.C.A. retains easement rights to the road lot.
The agreement with the county in putting in the P.E.A.R. has not been followed and thus the county of Hawaii can null and void it's obligations to the P.E.A.R. lot section itself opening up a HUGE can of worms that will lead to many years of litigation .
In addition to this - some of the charter and bylaws of H.A.R.C. are highly questionable and being that H.A.R.C. was never recognized by the State Land Court - H.A.R.C. is a non entity .
State laws prohibit board members of H.A.C.A. or H.A.R.C. from being compensated in any way shape or form under the non profit status they both now utilize.
Ultimately it is the County of Hawaii and H.A.C.A. who are responsible for the road lot itself .
If you read the original charter of H.A.C.A. that was approved by the State Land Court in the 1960s you will see this as fact .
H.A.R.C. was never approved to exist by the State Land Court.
The agreement with the county in putting in the P.E.A.R. has not been followed and thus the county of Hawaii can null and void it's obligations to the P.E.A.R. lot section itself opening up a HUGE can of worms that will lead to many years of litigation .
In addition to this - some of the charter and bylaws of H.A.R.C. are highly questionable and being that H.A.R.C. was never recognized by the State Land Court - H.A.R.C. is a non entity .
State laws prohibit board members of H.A.C.A. or H.A.R.C. from being compensated in any way shape or form under the non profit status they both now utilize.
Ultimately it is the County of Hawaii and H.A.C.A. who are responsible for the road lot itself .
If you read the original charter of H.A.C.A. that was approved by the State Land Court in the 1960s you will see this as fact .
H.A.R.C. was never approved to exist by the State Land Court.