Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HB2570: Mandatory Road Dues for all?
#29
lquade - Correct - The county does NOT pay the road dues so they are not members of good standing .They do however maintain Rd 8 by mowing and haphazardly filling potholes but Rd 8 is falling apart almost as rapidly as Rd 1 - 10 years ago .
The county also accepts liability on Rd 8 in case of accidents .
It is only a matter of time before the road lot will be widened to either county standards ( 60 feet width ) or state standards of (80 ft width ) .
The county will not touch any sub standard subdivision roads under the 60ft minimum although the P.E.A.R. was illegal and set precedent .
Several years ago a lava tube collapsed on Rd D between 6 and 7.
We approached the HARC board to pay for the entire repair from our own pockets and were told by the couple in charge to leave it alone as it is a state matter .They did say off the record that if we gave them the 25K in cash they would repair it themselves .We asked for this in writing and the couple in charge refused .To this day the puka is getting bigger and bigger.
The monies diverted after the S.Kulani Bridge was built still need to be paid back with interest after almost 50 years.
About the road lot ( Lot 6213 } is in the name of NISHIMURA MITSUSHI Trustee in Japan . Tropic Estates is still owned by the silent trust in Japan.
The fact that our deeds say we all own a portion of this road lot is just a technicality so the silent trust is not responsible for any maintenance or liability .
Originally the sub division was both Fern Acres and the then Tropic Estates but the State Land Court basically said way to big .Thus in haste the two subdivisions were born.
Mrs.Mimosa

Reply


Messages In This Thread
HB2570: Mandatory Road Dues for all? - by randomq - 02-15-2018, 10:48 AM
RE: HB2570: Mandatory Road Dues for all? - by Mimosa - 02-16-2018, 05:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 17 Guest(s)