03-06-2018, 03:32 AM
Expanded article this morning gives this excuse:
"When asked about the length of time it took for the pathologist’s conclusion, Bird explained that the pathologist had to go through her literature, which takes time, rather than making a rash judgment.
The pathologist could not be reached for comment."
Really? I think she could have gone through most of an entire medical library in seven months. Here's a link to today's article, but it may be behind the pay wall by now:
http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/03/06...180bacd656
"When asked about the length of time it took for the pathologist’s conclusion, Bird explained that the pathologist had to go through her literature, which takes time, rather than making a rash judgment.
The pathologist could not be reached for comment."
Really? I think she could have gone through most of an entire medical library in seven months. Here's a link to today's article, but it may be behind the pay wall by now:
http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/03/06...180bacd656