09-19-2018, 01:22 PM
How are the people here asking for Jen to explain her CURRNT UNEASE WITH REPRESENTING HER CONSTITUIENTS "missing the point"?
Perhaps the writer of the letter referenced above, and Riversnout, have just "come to understand that the lawful poitical status of the Hawaiian Islands ", but for most living here, in east Hawaii, the issues of the sovereign state of Hawaii and the Hawaiian Sovereignty movement should be nothin new.. ...
As I stated before, this issue is more than 100 years old, was an issue when Jen decided to run for office, was an issue when Jen won the office, has been an issue throughout her service.
WHY IS THIS NOW AN ISSUE?
Again, we are all trying to make sense of an educated person, who has lived in east Hawaii, that just realized that there may be a sovereignty issue....
This is why I would like JEN to post exactly which letter has made her decide, in late August, that she cannot legally represent us.
As far as the letter that was posted above, that would be more of an issue for Mike than Jen & more of an issue of her property status PRIOR to taking office than of her office in August 2018....
And those two instances may also explain why some of her constituents are surprised by her sudden unease with legally ambiguous issues....
Perhaps the writer of the letter referenced above, and Riversnout, have just "come to understand that the lawful poitical status of the Hawaiian Islands ", but for most living here, in east Hawaii, the issues of the sovereign state of Hawaii and the Hawaiian Sovereignty movement should be nothin new.. ...
As I stated before, this issue is more than 100 years old, was an issue when Jen decided to run for office, was an issue when Jen won the office, has been an issue throughout her service.
WHY IS THIS NOW AN ISSUE?
Again, we are all trying to make sense of an educated person, who has lived in east Hawaii, that just realized that there may be a sovereignty issue....
This is why I would like JEN to post exactly which letter has made her decide, in late August, that she cannot legally represent us.
As far as the letter that was posted above, that would be more of an issue for Mike than Jen & more of an issue of her property status PRIOR to taking office than of her office in August 2018....
And those two instances may also explain why some of her constituents are surprised by her sudden unease with legally ambiguous issues....