10-20-2018, 05:02 AM
Legal advice for county to planning is reasonable - hold off while pending litigation. Thats the trend from state legislature in past year. Anything that is in legal state of flux should be prevented from being approved, denied, changed in value one way or the other. Fortunately due to May volcanic activity, there wasnt time for state to write, hear, re write and approve a custom Bill for new legislation. Trends shown throughout the past session:proposal, hearing, passage of other legislation like House Bill 1614:Automatic Restraining Orders (Act 213) indicates a clear mindset of “put everything on hold until courts finalize a determination”.
Im not defending one side or other here, only sharing evidence of mindset from state.
Not everything coming from our county offices is of their own invention, in fact.
Blaming, name calling, assumption of finality could be misplaced.
Posts here clearly show noobs, FOBs, do NOT “get” volcanology!
Its not a mathmatical statistics problem from high school. (Number of flows per hundreds of years, what are my chances in next hundred...LOL)
Remember the controversy over Lava Zone designations update of 1991?
Albeit the duty was to only to inform, present data as requested. Noone else can be responsible for use and misuse of data.
Most common threads in lava zone 1- people really do NOT assimilate lava zone risk, or dont do homework to learn where the flows of 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and since have been geographically and pragmatically.
County as always will be damned by many regardless of action.
When people desire anyone else to be accountable for their choices, they’ll screaming loudly
B/c someone else made a suggestion.
Easy solution.
Im not defending one side or other here, only sharing evidence of mindset from state.
Not everything coming from our county offices is of their own invention, in fact.
Blaming, name calling, assumption of finality could be misplaced.
Posts here clearly show noobs, FOBs, do NOT “get” volcanology!
Its not a mathmatical statistics problem from high school. (Number of flows per hundreds of years, what are my chances in next hundred...LOL)
Remember the controversy over Lava Zone designations update of 1991?
Albeit the duty was to only to inform, present data as requested. Noone else can be responsible for use and misuse of data.
Most common threads in lava zone 1- people really do NOT assimilate lava zone risk, or dont do homework to learn where the flows of 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and since have been geographically and pragmatically.
County as always will be damned by many regardless of action.
When people desire anyone else to be accountable for their choices, they’ll screaming loudly
B/c someone else made a suggestion.
Easy solution.