01-15-2020, 07:19 AM
state’s Supreme Court has ruled unanimously (5-0) that the Hawaii Superferry
Of course in the case of the TMT the Supreme Court ruled in it’s favor. What we need now is a governor who will enforce the law. Lingle took on the corrupt Maui County garbage collectors Uku Pau system and won. It’s one of the reasons she was elected Governor. Voters wanted someone who showed they could get things done.
Edited to add:
BTW hokuili, using your argument and logic:
* In your view Linda Lingle's Act Two was proven wrong because the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled against the Super Ferry. The project therefore could not proceed despite Lingle's support and preference.
* Last year the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled in favor of the TMT and against the protestors.
* It would logically follow that in this case the protestors are wrong, and the protestors like Linda Lingle should step aside despite their objections and opposition, and allow the decision of the Hawaii Supreme Court to stand.
Correct?
Of course in the case of the TMT the Supreme Court ruled in it’s favor. What we need now is a governor who will enforce the law. Lingle took on the corrupt Maui County garbage collectors Uku Pau system and won. It’s one of the reasons she was elected Governor. Voters wanted someone who showed they could get things done.
Edited to add:
BTW hokuili, using your argument and logic:
* In your view Linda Lingle's Act Two was proven wrong because the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled against the Super Ferry. The project therefore could not proceed despite Lingle's support and preference.
* Last year the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled in favor of the TMT and against the protestors.
* It would logically follow that in this case the protestors are wrong, and the protestors like Linda Lingle should step aside despite their objections and opposition, and allow the decision of the Hawaii Supreme Court to stand.
Correct?
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves