HPP BIZ: Part the third

[Stillwater]

I have to clarification of your question of judicial judgment Reni, however I feel the position the BOD is in it is the correct assessment for the situation. Article IX section 2 the president - call and preside meetings of the board
Yes your district rep and another director did call a meeting and appointed their choice of replacement directors with a meeting recorded by a secretary that is not in contract with HPP and was not approved by the board and when a property owner asked for her to be introduced the said directors refused transparency this is troubling on its own there was no officer ie secretary that was a legitimate official volunteer or contracted for an official swearing in process in my opinion
This meeting then closed and proceeded into executive session the question is was the golden rule of the bylaws broken with the sharing of executive business? Maybe
Most alarming is you state the district rep had consulted with an attorney - who’s attorney? A director is never allowed to act on their own neither consulting an HPP attorney or otherwise without board consent please enlighten when this permission was given for 1 director to contact an attorney. Through my Lens I do not see transparency in this at all . Yes I feel the membership should have their quarterly meetings but I also feel they should have all the truth, transparency, and information imperative for sound decision making for the community at this point I don’t feel they are getting this. I am willing to share all the Sunshine and transparency without sputtering this is my perspective you requested Reni hope your day is spectacular!