03-07-2020, 03:29 AM
"Why would it be "more likely a false positive"? Why not more likely a false negative? Or, perhaps a 50 - 50 shot either way?
To me, if we are getting false readings either way how much confidence can we have in any of these tests?"
Almost every medical test has false positives and false negatives. Doesn't mean it's a 50-50 shot.
Nobody on the Westerdam has tested positive for Coronavirus, except one person who then tested negative.
If it was onboard, we would know about it by now, other people would've caught it.
Cambodia did the right thing. Better to make your actions science-based than fear-based.
To me, if we are getting false readings either way how much confidence can we have in any of these tests?"
Almost every medical test has false positives and false negatives. Doesn't mean it's a 50-50 shot.
Nobody on the Westerdam has tested positive for Coronavirus, except one person who then tested negative.
If it was onboard, we would know about it by now, other people would've caught it.
Cambodia did the right thing. Better to make your actions science-based than fear-based.