03-07-2020, 06:58 AM
I suggest anyone who's commenting that they're disturbed by what they read here to be reminded that they can choose not to read this thread.
FACT: Tomk's facts are based on having met Obermann in person so his defense has only one facet.
FACT: Tomk hasn't met Leilani Bronson-Crelly and she is well known as an abrasive person in HPP politics with a well known agenda against very specific politics and people that matches Obie's posts.
FACT: Leilani Bronson-Crelly is friends with Mr Obermann.
FACT: Mr Obermann has posted on PT.
FACT: Leilani Bronson-Crelly could be posting using Obermann's handle Obie.
FACT: Tomk doesn't attend board and membership meetings.
FACT: Tomk's opinion, reality and assessment is his own as is anyone else's.
FACT: Tomk attacked my credibility and I had a right to respond.
Obviously in a lawsuit there are two sides, the plaintiff/s and the defendant/s. The defendants which includes THE ASSOCIATION is at a disadvantage because the lawsuit docs only have allegations from the plaintiff's side. They are 100% false and legal counsels as I stated before, said "they threw everything but the kitchen sink", and/or "threw everything on the wall to see what would stick".
FACT: Since the plaintiff put all these allegations in his lawsuit, he will be hard pressed to produce material evidence. Craig Crelly is very involved with the lawsuit that many wonder why he's not a plaintiff, and it was stated as such at the Oct 3, 2019 court hearing by HPP's attorney, so this is public knowledge.
The FACTS will come out in an evidentiary hearing. We have all the FACTS and material evidence for our defense so I have no fears.
Stillwater, same as Obie, you have way too much inside knowledge of HPP politics. You and I have debated in director emails for a year so I recognize your writing and your personal attacks. You won't answer my question about the auditor meeting that you mentioned to KPHawaii in your post, even though I've asked you multiple times and you continue to deflect my question. You did this while you were a director when I asked for transparency.
You won't answer my question because it will out yourself as the former treasurer.
FACT: Tomk's facts are based on having met Obermann in person so his defense has only one facet.
FACT: Tomk hasn't met Leilani Bronson-Crelly and she is well known as an abrasive person in HPP politics with a well known agenda against very specific politics and people that matches Obie's posts.
FACT: Leilani Bronson-Crelly is friends with Mr Obermann.
FACT: Mr Obermann has posted on PT.
FACT: Leilani Bronson-Crelly could be posting using Obermann's handle Obie.
FACT: Tomk doesn't attend board and membership meetings.
FACT: Tomk's opinion, reality and assessment is his own as is anyone else's.
FACT: Tomk attacked my credibility and I had a right to respond.
Obviously in a lawsuit there are two sides, the plaintiff/s and the defendant/s. The defendants which includes THE ASSOCIATION is at a disadvantage because the lawsuit docs only have allegations from the plaintiff's side. They are 100% false and legal counsels as I stated before, said "they threw everything but the kitchen sink", and/or "threw everything on the wall to see what would stick".
FACT: Since the plaintiff put all these allegations in his lawsuit, he will be hard pressed to produce material evidence. Craig Crelly is very involved with the lawsuit that many wonder why he's not a plaintiff, and it was stated as such at the Oct 3, 2019 court hearing by HPP's attorney, so this is public knowledge.
The FACTS will come out in an evidentiary hearing. We have all the FACTS and material evidence for our defense so I have no fears.
Stillwater, same as Obie, you have way too much inside knowledge of HPP politics. You and I have debated in director emails for a year so I recognize your writing and your personal attacks. You won't answer my question about the auditor meeting that you mentioned to KPHawaii in your post, even though I've asked you multiple times and you continue to deflect my question. You did this while you were a director when I asked for transparency.
You won't answer my question because it will out yourself as the former treasurer.