(11-12-2021, 09:40 PM)Obie Wrote: The noise complaint was actually the reckless endangering. Must have been a mistake by the court .
Unlikely. It's obvious they couldn't make reckless endangerment stick so they changed to disorderly conduct for making a ruckus at the airport. I would imagine if they had better legal representation that wouldn't have stuck either.
Courts don't make mistakes like that!