Or not... ;) Just because a Hawaii landowner says something doesn't make it related to Hawaii? But I'm also a Hawaii landowner - why don't I have free speech rights to say whatever I want and not have it censored?
Oh, even the ACLU says speech "may be restricted only if it will clearly cause direct and imminent harm to an important societal interest" (say like spreading vaccine misinformation during a pandemic and encouraging people to use horse dewormer instead?) Oh, and the Supreme Court recently upheld the right of the government to raise concerns with tech companies about content on their platforms? Oh, and websites like Punaweb are free to moderate however they want because they are private companies with section 230 protections? Oh, and if I don't like any of this I can go suck a poi ball? Ok, keep on moderating then I guess.
One order of poi balls and a local brew to drink please! Anything but a Coors "Banquet" really, as I'm not some surfing genocide-facilitating tech-bro face-eating-leopards-party-shockingly-ate-my-face doofus. Cheers! (IYKYK ;)
Oh, even the ACLU says speech "may be restricted only if it will clearly cause direct and imminent harm to an important societal interest" (say like spreading vaccine misinformation during a pandemic and encouraging people to use horse dewormer instead?) Oh, and the Supreme Court recently upheld the right of the government to raise concerns with tech companies about content on their platforms? Oh, and websites like Punaweb are free to moderate however they want because they are private companies with section 230 protections? Oh, and if I don't like any of this I can go suck a poi ball? Ok, keep on moderating then I guess.
One order of poi balls and a local brew to drink please! Anything but a Coors "Banquet" really, as I'm not some surfing genocide-facilitating tech-bro face-eating-leopards-party-shockingly-ate-my-face doofus. Cheers! (IYKYK ;)