11-04-2024, 12:36 AM
(11-03-2024, 11:18 PM)Obie Wrote: "I lived in East Millcreek, an unincorporated section of Salt Lake County just south of the Salt Lake City limits.
CBU's are the only choice and they cannot be a long the existing roads.
That's it. Bottom line. No debate. Fact !!
What you read in the POM does not apply to HPP, so drop it."
Please provide evidence of these statements.
My experience with HPP politics on various committees, and on the board, for the past 14 yrs says otherwise. The USPS was willing to add more cluster boxes to the HPP easements. I was on the board when this dialog was going on between the Membership Mailbox Committee and the board. I attended a meeting where the local postmaster and the Honolulu postmaster attended. The Honolulu postmaster flew in and was given a tour of our subdivision and the existing cluster boxes. They were all on board to add more cluster mailboxes on the easements with improvements. This was before your time as a lot owner in HPP.
_______________
Obie: "How would HPPOA settle with Nicole Craig ? She wants punitive damages of $50.000.00 from the President, VP, and the entire board plus she is demanding the same from HPPOA."
The deed entitles the plaintiff damages whether she prevails or not. The board was well aware of that language in the deed before they decided to move forward stating they would their chances. I attended that special board meeting when lot owners asked the board to negotiate with the Watumulls FIRST. I guess you didn't attend that meeting Obie. The board refused to negotiate with the lot owners, hence the lawsuit was filed.
_______________________
Obie: "She wants the USPS to remove 3 Millon worth of mailboxes and the lots to be replanted with weeds and invasives.
How could they possibly agree to that ???"
The mailboxes were installed AFTER the lawsuit was filed. Don't you think perhaps the board was reckless and arrogant to move forward knowing the judge could "request the land return to it's natural state" as he stated at an early hearing? Yet the board kept moving forward expeditiously, clearing more land and installing mailboxes. Question: Why would the board illegally form their own Bylaw Committee (after dissolving the Members BLC) to amend bylaws to give them authorization to spend lot owner monies as they wish, IF the bylaws already provided them that authorization as they claimed?