08-06-2007, 01:49 PM
"Maybe the people who want better service through T-Mobile can have the tower next to their houses. Is it really worth the increased cancer risk (children, adults, animals) to place a cell tower right near homes? Not to mention it will be a big ugly thing hovering over the Nanawale forest. Many people move to the rainforest to get away from smog and cell towers. We don't need great cell coverage EVERYWHERE. My 2 cents."
I agree with you Glennoid. Must we pollute the last paradise with dangerous-to-your-health and ugly dangerous-to-your-house behemoth cell towers? Can we possibly live with "old-fashioned" land phone lines and thus avoid higher risks of brain cancer/leukemia? I live in Nanawale with no cell reception where I live. At times it's inconvenient, but there's no comparison between an inconvenience and a major pollution. Read "The Wump World" by Bill Peet, and "The Last Paradise" by James Houston. My two cents.
Edited by - maud gonne on 08/06/2007 18:11:05
I agree with you Glennoid. Must we pollute the last paradise with dangerous-to-your-health and ugly dangerous-to-your-house behemoth cell towers? Can we possibly live with "old-fashioned" land phone lines and thus avoid higher risks of brain cancer/leukemia? I live in Nanawale with no cell reception where I live. At times it's inconvenient, but there's no comparison between an inconvenience and a major pollution. Read "The Wump World" by Bill Peet, and "The Last Paradise" by James Houston. My two cents.
Edited by - maud gonne on 08/06/2007 18:11:05