08-19-2007, 02:29 AM
Glen, Your point on diversion is one we just had confirmed in our Field Evironmental course. Our intructor brought up the point that The state is not likely to divert lava because of the lack of adequate control technology & the fact that if the flow is diverted, it could cause damage (and liability) to someones else's property (lava flow is an 'act of God', anything man would do to divert it is a liability of man)
The current flow might get to 130, maybe between Ainaloa & Pahoa or it may go slighly towards Pahoa -Leilani estates. but all of this is speculative at the moment, as the 1983-86 flows course that this flow is meandering around did not extend much farther than this flow.
The current flow might get to 130, maybe between Ainaloa & Pahoa or it may go slighly towards Pahoa -Leilani estates. but all of this is speculative at the moment, as the 1983-86 flows course that this flow is meandering around did not extend much farther than this flow.