Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific
#9
The one they're talking about is good to power 60,000 homes, more than our geothermal! If operated by privates, if shut down, they would loose money! Unlike Gov employees who get OT to fix it! They could recycle as they see fit, whichever is the best way to remove each class of trash!

15 Nimbies at one hearing, doesn't sound like much publicity has been expended for the opening hearings!

Anyone who thinks the states' Hi5 project is a booming sucess (winding lines in hot alleyways), wait till you have to go to the nasty plastic line and the empty can(metal) line, and the styrofoam line! Govt loves to give us lines! Nimbies usually can donate their recyclables cause they can afford it, no lines for them!

Anyone who sees a multi trash pickup in the future, unless our tax base rises hugely, forget it! Nope, you'l go to lines for inspection of each item (A shiny magazine in the newspapers), back of the line! Ever been busted for a plastic bottle cap left on, back of the line! A piece of corn in a soup can, back of the line!
Gordon J Tilley
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-11-2008, 10:12 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-11-2008, 11:25 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-12-2008, 03:42 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by gtill - 03-12-2008, 04:46 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-12-2008, 05:29 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-12-2008, 09:53 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-12-2008, 02:20 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-12-2008, 03:53 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 05:49 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 09:15 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 12:17 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 01:10 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 01:38 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-13-2008, 02:51 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-14-2008, 03:35 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-15-2008, 07:31 AM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 03-15-2008, 02:40 PM
RE: The Wheelabrator Survey was not Scientific - by Guest - 05-18-2008, 03:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)