05-02-2008, 04:00 PM
Good questions Bob,
I have assumed we are trying to grow our fuel to lessen dependence on oil. The objective is first rate.
It is my opinion that growing fuel will not work. I think the evidence of food price increases and shortages already prove the point.
I understand about everyone having a different agendas, but for me food should not be compromised. A basic need for life.
I would vote for solar, wind, ocean wave, geothermal, higher tax on gas to lower consumption, higher tax on low mileage cars, and whatever it takes to get folks to conserve more.
It is sad and selfish that we as a country use so much energy to drive our cars, that a basic need of life (esp for the poor) is compromised in the US and around the world.
I have assumed we are trying to grow our fuel to lessen dependence on oil. The objective is first rate.
It is my opinion that growing fuel will not work. I think the evidence of food price increases and shortages already prove the point.
I understand about everyone having a different agendas, but for me food should not be compromised. A basic need for life.
I would vote for solar, wind, ocean wave, geothermal, higher tax on gas to lower consumption, higher tax on low mileage cars, and whatever it takes to get folks to conserve more.
It is sad and selfish that we as a country use so much energy to drive our cars, that a basic need of life (esp for the poor) is compromised in the US and around the world.