07-12-2008, 02:47 AM
Ms. Edwards,
Despite Mr. Orts' lucid (and appreciated) amplification, indicating that the matter could be "fixed" at a later date, my question remains.
Why did the original proposal not address the issue in all its aspects? Would it not be in everyone's interest to deal with the matter only once?
Does Ms. Naeole wish to continue to give the impression that she puts out good ideas without ample preparation, hoping that someone else will pick up the pieces later?
Despite Mr. Orts' lucid (and appreciated) amplification, indicating that the matter could be "fixed" at a later date, my question remains.
Why did the original proposal not address the issue in all its aspects? Would it not be in everyone's interest to deal with the matter only once?
Does Ms. Naeole wish to continue to give the impression that she puts out good ideas without ample preparation, hoping that someone else will pick up the pieces later?