Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
History of the making of Puna's subdivisions
#36
I still don't understand. All I see when I read the PCDP is nothing but a General Plan. A general plan like the hundreds of thousands already in existence all over the US. About the only thing that makes the PCDP unique is that the people had such a large say in the process. Normally, they are developed in some government office by government workers, bureaucrats, and paid political consultants with the occasion public input. The PCDP seems to have been developed in reverse with the people having the big say. But beyond that, I saw nothing in it that resembles what you’re saying. I know that most people are so use to a GP that is nothing but a revision of a revision, of a revision, written decades ago, so this may be a shocker when they are there from the birth. The PCDP is just a blueprint for the general direction of the district.

So, I guess I'll just be confused over the issue.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by Guest - 08-05-2008, 03:15 PM
RE: History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by Guest - 08-06-2008, 07:23 AM
RE: History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by missydog1 - 08-06-2008, 12:27 PM
RE: History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by Guest - 08-11-2008, 10:10 AM
RE: History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by Bob Orts - 08-11-2008, 03:07 PM
RE: History of the making of Puna's subdivisions - by missydog1 - 09-02-2008, 12:35 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)