08-17-2008, 11:23 AM
You -> What about a building permit?
FAA?
Department of Health, solid waste branch?
Me -> As I said, I didn't list all the permits required, just those that are traditionally time consuming (and I confess those that popped into my mind). If you want exact requirements, my standard consulting fee is $450/hr.
On the other hand, I should have mentioned Solid Waste because it's important.
As for the other "permits" you mention:
FAA Part 77 regulates structure height in proximity to an airport or other facility where the FAA has jurisdiction. Assuming the facility you're constructing is outside the jurisdictional area as described in FAA Part 77, the FAA doesn't care other than a general requirement for anti-collision lighting under the right conditions. Regardless, in no case does the FAA issue a "permit". They issue a finding that the structure is or is not a hazard to aviation.
Building permits and meeting zoning requirements are universally required so they don't seem significant to this discussion. As an aside, in the context of this discussion a building permit would be more significant to those trying to obstruct construction than to the people trying to get the facility built.
You -> This is personal and not really civil.
"people such as yourself"
Me -> So, you wouldn't oppose construction of a WTE plant? Look, if you find the truth about your actions insulting I recommend you reconsider your actions instead of trying to insult someone who has spoken the obvious truth.
You -> Will not have further discussion with uncivil fakes.
Me -> Who I am has nothing to do with the atmospheric chemistry, the economics, or the environmental viability of your ideas, all of which you steadfastly refuse to address. By your statements it seems you demonstrate very nicely that your arguments are based on dogma rather than facts. If you find that observation insulting too, again I don't know how to apologize for the truth being true.
BTW, as for the Billy "dust up", you don't get to decide what risks I'm willing to take.
FAA?
Department of Health, solid waste branch?
Me -> As I said, I didn't list all the permits required, just those that are traditionally time consuming (and I confess those that popped into my mind). If you want exact requirements, my standard consulting fee is $450/hr.
On the other hand, I should have mentioned Solid Waste because it's important.
As for the other "permits" you mention:
FAA Part 77 regulates structure height in proximity to an airport or other facility where the FAA has jurisdiction. Assuming the facility you're constructing is outside the jurisdictional area as described in FAA Part 77, the FAA doesn't care other than a general requirement for anti-collision lighting under the right conditions. Regardless, in no case does the FAA issue a "permit". They issue a finding that the structure is or is not a hazard to aviation.
Building permits and meeting zoning requirements are universally required so they don't seem significant to this discussion. As an aside, in the context of this discussion a building permit would be more significant to those trying to obstruct construction than to the people trying to get the facility built.
You -> This is personal and not really civil.
"people such as yourself"
Me -> So, you wouldn't oppose construction of a WTE plant? Look, if you find the truth about your actions insulting I recommend you reconsider your actions instead of trying to insult someone who has spoken the obvious truth.
You -> Will not have further discussion with uncivil fakes.
Me -> Who I am has nothing to do with the atmospheric chemistry, the economics, or the environmental viability of your ideas, all of which you steadfastly refuse to address. By your statements it seems you demonstrate very nicely that your arguments are based on dogma rather than facts. If you find that observation insulting too, again I don't know how to apologize for the truth being true.
BTW, as for the Billy "dust up", you don't get to decide what risks I'm willing to take.