08-25-2008, 01:09 PM
quote:So your proposing a moratorium on building based on:
Originally posted by JWFITZ
I'm just wondering when the shoe will drop from the state level, policy will come to Puna. At some point a building moratorium will be necessary to save Hawaii. At THIS point it would be good to take that drastic step while there is something of both ecology and economy to save.
Stuff to think about, and I'd like to hear other's informed views.
1. An environmental issue
2. That impacts not a specific limited area
3. That has a regional impact
4. That can not be resolved through the current system
5. And is designed to come up with a plan
6. By a government or quasi-government entity
Is that correct?
( For you legal/planning folks: Tahoe? Dolan? Nolan? Lucus? All?)