08-26-2008, 08:26 AM
quote:You -> Trying to persuade people that this akamai voter site is not bogus will not work. We are much smarter then that.
Originally posted by Damon
Get a grip.
I said "I don't doubt the content of the site".... what does that mean to you?
I have always said from the very first post that I posted on my blog that I think it's a smear only because of the fact that the guy was anonymous.
Had he came out with all sides of the story on his blog as well as identified himself and what his motivation for making the site was *edit* then he would have more credibility, but he DIDN'T so*edit* then to me... it's still a smear.... (and the content of the site, correct as it is... has nothing to do with my thoughts on the author of the site)
The site has now personally bashed Hunter. What in the heck does bashing a personal blogger have to do with being an Akamaivoter?
If you can't see the slant in what is, then no worry. Trying to persuade people that this akamai voter site is not bogus will not work. We are much smarter then that.
And you again-> I said "I don't doubt the content of the site".... what does that mean to you?
Well, it means to me that the information on the site is accurate regardless of the anonymity of, or motivation of, the author.
And it also means to me that all this crap about it being a smear, as long as the information presented is true (which apparently you agree that it is), is a smoke screen designed to obscure the truth.
Finally, given your conflicting statements, it sure seems like you are trying to appear to be neutral while at the same time doing a little not so subtle character assassination. Then again, maybe "bogus" means something to you that I'm not aware of.
You-> The site has now personally bashed Hunter.
That would be the same Hunter who told us all that the police reports were meaningless, right? Look, I know you love the guy but it is pretty obvious he's not unbiased on this one.
I honestly can't figure you out Damon. On one hand I think you're simply sucking up to Hunter and on the other I think you too are a closet Kenoi supporter. But I do know this: whichever you are, your logic and your objectivity are whacked. I mean it is just simply silly to keep saying that because a story is put forth anonymously it is a smear. In politics it happens all the time that people want to remain anonymous when outing someone who has undo influence. The reasons for that should be obvious to everyone, just as the examples of it being done are legion. Anyway, rant on kid. As I said before when all the dust settles it just demonstrates your character.
One last thought, you said that "Had he came out with all sides of the story on his blog..." Well, maybe you can tell us all what the other side of the story actually is? Oh, I know. The other side is that Hunter already read the police reports and decided they were meaningless, so we don't need to read them ourselves. Gee, thanks for the help... brah.